Wed. Oct 7th, 2026

How drafts exposed a false CBI statement: The Delhi High Court’s findings

Court gavel (representative image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

The Delhi High Court examined successive drafts of the CBI’s August 2, 2016 reply.

An earlier draft said the DoPT had rejected the appeal proposal.

That text was deleted and replaced with handwritten words saying correspondence was under way.

The court said there was a reasonable foundation for allegations of false statements.

It directed complaint proceedings against six officers.

Justice Madhu Jain found that the CBI’s August 2, 2016 reply to a trial court contained a materially false assertion.

The reply had said that correspondence with the administrative ministry regarding further legal action was under way.

The High Court found that only an internal CBI deliberation was taking place at that time, and that no such correspondence with the ministry existed.

The case arose from CBI proceedings against a former Indian Revenue Service officer in a disproportionate assets case.

In January 2016, the High Court held the sanction for the officer’s prosecution invalid, and the officer was discharged.

In June 2016, the Ministry of Law and Justice gave an opinion that there appeared to be no reasonable ground to pursue the matter before a higher forum.

The opinion was communicated to the CBI through the Department of Personnel and Training on July 1, 2016.

The court examined successive drafts of the CBI’s reply.

An earlier draft said that the Department of Personnel and Training had rejected the appeal proposal, and that text was deleted and replaced with handwritten words saying correspondence was under way.

The court said this was not mere imprecise wording, and that there was a reasonable foundation for the allegations, according to Bar and Bench.

The court said there was a reasonable foundation for offences under Sections 191, 193 and 209 of the Indian Penal Code.

Section 191 deals with giving false evidence, Section 193 with punishment for false evidence, and Section 209 with a dishonest false claim in court.

Court gavel (representative image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0


Discover more from Times Release

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from Times Release

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading