Tue. Sep 22nd, 2026

Delhi SIR: Prashant Bhushan calls flagging process ‘totally opaque’

Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (representative image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Advocate Prashant Bhushan told the Supreme Court that the process of flagging Delhi voters in the Special Intensive Revision was ‘totally opaque’.

He said reasons such as ‘logical discrepancy’ were not explained to voters or published.

The court heard the matter on September 22.

About 33 lakh voters have received notices in the exercise.

Around 47.7 lakh names were removed from the draft roll.

The petition challenges notices issued to about 33 lakh people during the exercise.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioners, argued that the process was opaque.

He said the Election Commission had not disclosed the basis for flagging people as a ‘logical discrepancy’ or ‘unmapped’, either in the notices or on its website.

Bhushan said, in effect, that voters were not being told the specific reason their names were flagged.

The draft electoral roll for Delhi, published on August 31, 2026, removed about 47.7 lakh names from the existing list of roughly 1.45 crore electors.

Officials said around 97.51 lakh enumeration forms were collected or uploaded during the revision process.

The final electoral roll is scheduled to be published on November 4, 2026.

The deadline for filing claims for inclusion in the roll is September 30, 2026.

Special Intensive Revision is a process in which the Election Commission re-verifies the electoral roll, requiring voters to fill in enumeration forms and flagging discrepancies for further checks.

Prominent voters who received notices in the exercise included External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and BJP veteran L K Advani.

The Election Commission has said that receiving a notice does not by itself mean a person’s name will be removed from the roll.

The case is being watched closely because Delhi’s SIR could be a template for similar exercises the Election Commission may carry out in other states.

Supreme Court of India, New Delhi (representative image), Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0


Discover more from Times Release

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from Times Release

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading